Each of the two parties is controlled by the liquor interests
vs
EEOC case dumping scandal (1965 — T imGolden)
There is a certain element in the leadership of all parties which is not especially objectionable to men, but would not be tolerated by women. Candidates who would be perfectly acceptable to men if they were sound on the political issues might be wholly repudiated by the women of their own party. If temperance and morality were made requisites many leaders and officials who now hold high position would be permanently retired. These are all reasons which appeal to politicians for deferring the day of woman suffrage as long as possible.
Each of the two dominant parties is largely controlled by what are known as the liquor interests. Their influence begins with the National Government, which receives from them billions of revenue; it extends to the States, to which they pay millions; to the cities, whose income they increase by hundreds of thousands; to the farmers, who find in breweries and distilleries the best market for their grain. There is no hamlet so small as not to be touched by their ramifications. No “trust” ever formed can compare with them in the power which they exercise. That their business shall not be interfered with they must possess a certain authority over Congress and Legislatures. They and the various institutions connected with them control millions of votes. They are among the largest contributors to political campaigns. There are few legislators who do not owe their election in a greater or less degree to the influence wielded by these liquor interests, which are positively, unanimously and unalterably opposed to woman suffrage. This can be gained only by the submission of[Pg xx] an amendment to the National or State constitutions, and for that women must go to the Congress or the Legislatures. What can they offer to offset the influences behind these bodies? They have no money to contribute for party purposes. They represent no constituency and can not pledge a single vote, a situation in which no other class is placed. They ask men to divide a power of which they now have a monopoly; to give up a sure thing for an uncertainty; to sacrifice every selfish interest — and all in the name of abstract justice, a word which has no place in politics. Was there ever apparently a more hopeless quest?
vs
Trump: America ‘worships God, not government’
vs
Trump to Seek [God? nyet!] $54 Billion Increase in Military Spending
vs
=
Q1: how much have y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress] sunk
into 1 warship (since 2009)?
A1: $13 billion
+
Q2: how much have y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress] invested
in EEOC (since 1965) to eradicate workplace harassment and discrimination?
A2: $10 billion
=
Q3: do y’all [Republican Party + Democratic Party] worship G-D?
A3: nyet!
+
Clinton’s EEOC vs Bush’s EEOC vs Obama’s EEOC vs Trump’s EEOC
A: The EEOC also is not a high priority of President Clinton.
While he (Clinton) has proposed raising the agency’s budget
to $268 million next year,
1) he didn’t get a chairman installed for nearly 21 months
and
2) he waited two full years before nominating a new prosecutor
for the commission (the EEOC).
p.s.
Trust but Verify
p.p.s.
+
Q: did not EEOC chairman Gilbert Casellas say
1) he has not met privately with President Clinton
since his confirmation (16 months ago)
2) the White House has not returned his telephone calls.
3) “Nobody gives a crap about us,” Ca\sellas said.
(google it! vs duckduckgo it! vs yahoo! it vs aol it! vs bing it! vs wing it?)
p.s.
Trust but Verify
p.p.s.
+
from page 271 (American Work Values: Their Origin and Development):
Year — — — — # of backlog EEOC complaints — — # of EEOC investigators
FY 1994 — — — — — 96,945 — — — — — — — — — — — 732
FY 1990 — — — — — 41,987 — — — — — — — — — — — 762
p.s.
FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD! on y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress]
p.p.s.
Trust but Verify
p.p.p.s.
+
Even if the EEOC quit accepting any more complaints,
its 732 investigators would need at least 1 1/2 years to get through
the estimated 91,000 cases already in their files.
p.s.
FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD! on y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress]
p.p.s.
Trust but Verify
p.p.p.s.
+
+
Nonfeasance is the intentional failure to perform a required duty or obligation.
Q: did Presidents Bush and Obama under-fund and under-staff EEOC for(e!) 16 years?
+
+
+
+
Fact: I gave NY EEOC (500 pages!) 10 faxes+7 overnight deliveries
+
7 overnight deliveries +medium.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
if I’ve given y’all [Caesar] one million dollars (in taxes over 30 years) then why haven’t y’all [Caesar] taken any actions for me? [HE HE HE]
+
Q: are y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress] pro-CHRIST or anti-CHRIST?
=
Timothy Golden 5 months ago
bro(t)her! I do don’t you want (desire) to ‘see and hear’:
1) a Chinese pope right wrongs for G-D!
2) a Jewish US president right wrongs for G-D!
2 years, 3 months ago on http://www.livefyre.com/profile/66202833/
+
Discussion on The Hill 171 comments
Trump boasts that his Cabinet has “highest IQ of any Cabinet ever assembled”
I would have never dreamed many years ago that
I would be able to be here as THE APPROPRIATOR
for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
- Senator Barbara A. Mikulski
Thursday, May 3, 2007
vs
EEOC case dumping scandal 2009–2017
WE’RE CHAMPIONS here of CIVIL RIGHTS and this is why
we want this agency, UNDER OUR STEWARDSHIP, to be
one of the best in our portfolio.
- Senator Barbara A. Mikulski
Thursday, May 3, 2007
vs
EEOC case dumping scandal 2009–2017
As the Chairwoman of the Senate’s Appropriations Committee,
Barbara Mikulski has always known that
OUR BUDGETS SHOULD REFLECT OUR DEEPEST HELD VALUES
- President Obama
May 3, 2015
vs
EEOC case dumping scandal 2009–2017
Nonfeasance
The intentional failure to perform a required duty or obligation.
Nonfeasance is a term used in Tort Law to describe inaction
that allows or results in harm to a person or to property.
An act of nonfeasance can result in liability if
(1) the actor owed a duty of care toward the injured person,
(2) the actor failed to act on that duty, and
(3) the failure to act resulted in injury.
“From a personal standpoint, being the nation’s
chief law-enforcement officer for equal employment opportunity was
very rewarding” Casellas says.
vs
U.S. Department of Justice,
Q: did not EEOC chairman Gilbert Casellas say
1) he has not met privately with President Clinton
since his confirmation (16 months ago)
2) the White House has not returned his telephone calls.
3) “Nobody gives a crap about us,” Ca\sellas said.
(google it! vs google chrome it! vs wing it?)
+
Dear U.S. Department of Justice,
Q: who hacked my Disqus account?
Q: who added Businessman, super hero, Bat lover?
Q: who added a link to https://batman-news.com/ ?
+
+
+
+
Clinton waited 2 years before naming an EEOC General Counsel?
vs
Trump has waited 9 months (so far)
+
+
+
y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress] better start righting before G-D says, “spirits! put your man (pencils) down!”
+
or
golden calf (Then) vs golden calf (Today)
hinT:
golden calf (tunc) vs golden calf (nunc)
+
+
+
+
+
golden calf (tunc) vs golden calf (nunc) site:medium.com at DuckDuckGo
Edit description
duckduckgo.com
+
=
p.s.
sip! sip!
