The Case Against Napping At Work
Disqus Digests <notifications@disqus.net>
To treasurelife911@yahoo.com Monday, April 10, 2017 10:16 AM
Tim Golden • 2 years ago Sunday, June 21, 2015 11:29 AM
U.S. Department of Justice? (Scooby Do!o),
where are you?
Fact1: On 11/2/2009 I suffered an on-duty work-accident with injuries
Fact2: On 3/28/2013 NYS WCALJudge Robert Anderson classified me as having Permanent Partial Disability (PPD);
for employer Verizon I could do inside work or outside work
(as an inside technician or as an outside technician) with restrictions
Fact3: [you know who] never engaged me and my doctor Dr. Lippe
“in good faith” in the mandatory ADA interactive process
Fact4: [you know who] never (not once in 5 years) offered me
a reasonable accommodation (a reassignment) in writing
Fact5: [you know who] did not get me (the 1st time)
my 2010 W2 until April 6, 2011; 3 months late!
(ADA violation and IRS violation prove no interactive process)
Fact6: [you know who] did not get me (the 2nd time)
my 2012 W2 until April 19, 2013; 3 months late!
(ADA violation and IRS violation prove no interactive process)
p.p.s.
On March 21, 2014 I filed a written disability discrimination complaint [against you know who] with the NY EEOC
On or about May 9, 2014 [you know who] received from the NY EEOC my disability discrimination complaint(s)
On or about May 13, 2015 [you know who] responded (in writing) to the NY EEOC 12 months! (369 days!) later
Q: did [you know who] respond to the NY EEOC promptly (within 2 weeks)?
Q: why didn’t [you know who] respond promptly (within 2 weeks)?
Q: why did the NY EEOC let [you know who] take its time (12 months!) (369 days!) to respond?
On or about May 15, 2015 the NY EEOC notified me that [you know who ] responded
to my disability discrimination complaint(s)
The NY EEOC stated that I needed to respond by May 29, 2015 (within 2 weeks!)
p.p.p.s.
U.S. Department of Justice,
I responded to the NY EEOC with my 14th written communication
(which included my prior 13 written communications); 271 pages!
I followed THAT up with my 15th written communication; a 16 page fax
I followed THAT up with my 16th written communication; 100+ pages
p.p.p.p.s.
U.S. Department of Justice,
On or about June 9, 2015 the NY EEOC investigator and director signed order dismissing (denying me?)
my disability discrimination complaint(s) and case
p.p.p.p.p.s.
U.S. Department of Justice,
Fact: EEOC investigator Young never interviewed me or my witnesses
Fact: EEOC Enforcement Unit never interviewed me or my witnesses
Fact: EEOC investigator Zygmund never interviewed me or my witnesses
p.p.p.p.p.p.s.
Fact: I wrote (overnighted 500+ pages) to(o) the NY EEOC 7 times!
signed by E. Nixon on 3/21/14
signed by E. Nixon on 4/22/14
signed by E. Nixon on 5/13/14
signed by E. Nixon on 7/9/14
signed by E. Nixon on 1/6/15
signed by E. Nixon on 5/28/15
signed by E. Nixon on 6/2/15
I got back and I am saving
all 7 signed green cards (USPS Form 3811)
Fact: I faxed man y pages to(o) the NY EEOC 10 times!
I got back and I am saving
each fax confirmation
Q: did the NY EEOC ever “amend” my disability discrimination complaint(s)?
Q: if nyet (no)
then why nyet (no)?
p.p.p.p.p.p.p.s.
U.S. Department of Justice,
Investigate! the NY EEOC
for(e!):
1) misconduct and/or mismanagement (case-napping)
2) dereliction of duty (sleeping on the job?)
3) throwing out G-D’S Mail (as if T rash?)
4) failing to “amend” my disability discrimination complaint(s)
5) failing to investigate my disability discrimination complaint(s) in a ‘thorough and timely’ manner
p.p.p.p.p.p.p.p.s.
chew! chew!
in other words
Types of Celestial (Rorschach) Tests #3
p.s.
U.S. Department of Justice,
Fact: I’ve been waiting 7 years for Verizon to offer me (Taxpayer!)
a reasonable accommodation (i.e. a reassignment to Tone and Mark gang)
Fact: I’ve been waiting 7 years for Verizon to engage me “in good faith”
in the mandatory ADA interactive process
Fact: I’ve been waiting 7 years for Verizon to engage Dr. Lippe “in good faith”
in the mandatory ADA interactive process
p.p.s.
Q: are y’all [President(s) + OMB + Congress + EEOC] pro-CHRIST or anti-CHRIST?
